To all those children and their families that were harmed due the State of Georgia’s agencies’ continued obfuscation of the truth,
negligence, and incompetence with regard to their oversight of the former Ridge
Creek School facility, its former affiliate entities such as Hidden Lake
Academy and Ridge Creek Wilderness, this is for you.
To those citizen advocates, one teacher, an admission’s administrator, a counselor, and
only one DFCS employee, decent human beings, tirelessly fighting to expose the truth and ensure the safety and welfare of
the children at the Ridge Creek School facility, while being continually vilified by Ridge Creek School,
Inc.'s hierarchy - a machine of spineless attorneys, staff lackey’s, incompetent clergy, town groupies, and the like, this
is for you.
To those individuals at the State level that were contacted
by families for help, only to have their pleas fall on your insensitive, lying, condescending, placating,
deaf ears and stone hearts, for over a decade - ignoring children's rights - this
is for you.
For those individuals that ignored the
safety and well-being of our children, and to those parties that did not take personal responsibility
for their own egregious behavior as mandated reporters, this is for you.
For
those in power within the State of Georgia that ignored our cries, the cries of
our children, and did not take needed divisive action to remedy the imminent disaster
and debacle of the Ridge Creek School facility, take a bow with your co-horts:
All staff under the Ridge Creek School, Inc. corporate entity as mandated reporters; Georgia’s ORS/ORCC under DHS, including DFCS, DBHDD, and the DJJ; ADVANC-ED-SACS, Lumpkin County Police Department, Local, State, and Federal Judges, the GBI, the FBI, Gov. Nathan Deal, Gov. Deal’s Office of the Child Advocate, Children and Youth Committee, the State Attorney General’s Office, Lumpkin County District Attorney, Secretary of State Kemp, ORCC Commissioner Clyde Reese, and lastly, the pathetic Georgia Board of Examiners of Psychologists – this is for you.
Special recognition to NATSAP, the National Association of Therapeutic Schools and Programs and IECA, Independent Educational Consultants Association, trade associations, both of which continued to be blinded by their own greed and totally incompetent when it comes to understanding that they, too, are mandated reporters. Educational Consultants continued to send children to this facility, in
spite of damning, documented state
evidence. NATSAP ignored complaints. Take a bow. This is for you.
Recalling the first conversation in the Spring of 2011 with the
GAO Director of Investigations, the conversation moved to the number of children that attempted
suicides by hanging at the Ridge Creek School facility. He replied, “A hanging?” Response,“No, Sir, at last count six.” Shocked, he repeated, "Six, you say?” Reply, “Yes, Sir.” He responded, “One
is enough.” Apparently, it was not enough for the State of Georgia to
intercede. But, hey, after all, “He is
politically connected in downtown Atlanta.” Our final count before closure of
this facility, within one year, was in the double digits. Below is a summary of the findings stemming from the investigation in 2011 of the former Ridge Creek School facility in Georgia, the ORCC, and State of Georgia agencies by the Georgia Advocacy Office (GAO), Protection and Advocacy for the State of Georgia which is mandated by Congress. *Note: Permission was given by the GAO to share this document. It has been formatted for this article. The addressed individual has been deleted; Mr. McDaniel's signature did not transfer in formatting.
GAO FINDINGS:
GAO |
ADVOCACY The Protection and
Advocacy System
for People with Disabilities in Georgia
OFFICE
November 15, 2012
Re: Ridge
Creek School, Dahlonega, Georgia
Dear -
Thank you for your inquiry
regarding the findings
of the Georgia Advocacy Office (GAO) with regard to the facility
formerly operated by Ridge Creek School in Dahlonega, Georgia. As you know, Ridge Creek School provided
what has been described as a therapeutic school to incorporate
both education and counseling in a residential program for children
experiencing emotional disturbances. Multiple state human services agencies
utilized this program, including
the Department of Human Services/Division of Family and Children Services
(DFCS) and the Department of Juvenile Justice (DJJ).
Oversight was the responsibility of these agencies,
in addition to the licensing responsibility exercised by the Department of Human Services/Office of Residential Child
Care (ORCC) and the Department of Education. The
school was accredited
by the Southern
Association of Colleges
and Schools (SACS).
Over the course of several years,
ORCC identified multiple
and serious deficiencies in performance at the school in the course of investigating complaints and incidents and during annual reviews of the facility. Ridge Creek School
was cited by ORCC repeatedly for multiple regulatory violations including insufficient staffing, medications not administered accurately,
failure to provide
protective care and oversight and failure to report incidents. Often there were multiple and repeated citations
for the same deficiency, thereby demonstrating
Ridge
Creek's failure to identify, correct,
and maintain improvements. ORCC failed to follow through
to ensure that the documented deficiencies were ultimately remedied and the children confined there were protected from harm.
Many of the children at Ridge Creek
were in the custody
of DFCS or DJJ and were
confined to Ridge Creek under the authority
of those agencies. It is unclear to what extent DFCS and DJJ were made aware of the multiple
and repeated deficiencies of the facility. In some cases, DFCS and DJJ were made aware of incidents
at the facility along with the Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental Disabilities. In some cases, investigations
were
carried out, yet no agency focused
on the pattern of ongoing
issues that contributed to the unsafe environment which led to abuse and neglect of children who were in the care of Ridge Creek School.
Ridge Creek School also frequently requested
assistance from Lumpkin
County Police for multiple incidents
including property destruction, elopement, fights, sexual assault, and riots.
In one instance in January 2011, Lumpkin County
Police reported that approximately 11 students were causing damage to the school buildings by breaking out windows, setting off fire
TEL 404.885.1234 VOICE and TDD 800.537.2329 FAX 404.378.0031
WEB www.thegao.org
November 15, 2012
Page 2
extinguishers, making entry
into a building without permission, and knocking over office
equipment.
Although it is clear that oversight was inadequate, the diffusion of responsibility across agencies also raises significant
concerns for the continuing oversight of other residential programs similar to
that of Ridge Creek. We will be conducting additional inquiries into similar programs
in Georgia to identify ongoing problems
and opportunities for improvement. According to information provided
by the Georgia Department of Human Services, there are approximately ten other facilities that operate similar programs - residential treatment services with an onsite school operated
by the provider - with similar
competing oversight agencies,
within Georgia.
Problems with Ridge Creek School are emblematic of the multiple
oversight agencies that have jurisdiction, and the lack of coordination among the agencies.
This lack of coordination has resulted in multiple incidents that posed a threat to the health and safety
of children as well as incomplete records
and could repeat in other circumstances.
If you have any additional information that would expedite
further investigation, please contact us as soon as possible.
Sincerely,
Tobin McDaniel
Director of InvestigationsADVOCATES :
We remain hopeful that this will be a wake-up call for the State of Georgia, although their record is well-known to be less than stellar in child care and transparency. Perhaps the State of Georgia will look at these findings in a positive light, as grace given, from those that were given none. It's a stretch, but miracles happen.
Documents attest to the fact that this is a systemic problem. Change has to come from the top down, instead of promoting incompetence and nepotism. The mandate held that investigative reports and documents can be subjectively altered by supervisors under the DHS needs to cease immediately.
What was allowed to transpire at the Ridge Creek School facility and the harm it brought could have been stopped years back by the State of Georgia. If their leaders had any backbone, it would have saved far too many hardships. The State was complicit and therefore, culpable, with or without state immunity, which they utilize to shelter themselves. An image of our forefather's tear droplets comes to mind ... Thankfully, we have something they apparently do not have or lost - heart.
We expect reforms from the State of Georgia's DHS and its sister agencies as documents currently reflect systemic troubles in other like residential facilities for children currently operating in Georgia.
To date, there still has been no responsibility taken; state employees, who were mandated reporters, were promoted, no charges. Former staff that were mandated reporters have not been charged and continue to operate with their professional licenses intact - with children.
We are eternally grateful to the Georgia Advocacy Office (GAO) who truly believe that everyone has the right to live their life surrounded by hope, aspirations, respect, love, and community, despite their developmental disabilities. The GAO faces each day that dawns with new challenges; committed, professional, and forever in heart-felt service, they fight for the oppressed and vulnerable who have no voice such as our children. They mentor citizen advocates in their stature, honesty, and dedication. A trait that was quite refreshing after a decade of eye-opening cover-ups and incompetence.
Thank you to Director McDaniel and the entire staff at the GAO.
"For the Children Left Behind" and those to come ...
I am, Jill Ryan
Citizen Advocate
* A true copy of this document can be obtained by contacting jilliestake@live.com.
http://thegao.org/who-we-are/
Sincere thanks to Mr McDaniel for seeing this through. A refreshing change.
ReplyDeleteCheers Jillie! Sweet Vindication!
For all those who would prefer the public think we were a couple of hysterical mothers... this one's for you.
This industry has to radically change, or be brought done. If this level of abuse was happening at the "Cream of the Crop" program, what is happening in the 100s of others?
Now that there's a blueprint, should be easier to force change or closure much quicker.
If you are a mandatory reporter, do the right thing. Children should not be held incommunicado or abused under the guise of therapy.
D
This GAO report is at once damning and vindicating. The various state agencies and individual employees who were charged with protecting the children who attended HLA/RCS/RCW, except for the agency that issued this final report, are incompetent and corrupt in equal measure and should have their feet held to the fire collectively and individually. I wish the report had named names.
ReplyDeleteWhile these public agencies are at great fault, and this is no doubt true in states other than Georgia, the initial fault lies with the programs themselves, and those organizations like IECA and their individual members who refer distressed parents to them. I spent over 8 years working for two of them - HLA and Four Circles, a treatment center for teenagers and young adults – and the fact is the overwhelming majority of these type of programs simply do not work. Their actual “success rate”, if you can call it that, is typically under 20%, leaving a failure rate in excess of 80%. The programs and those who refer to them will of course dispute this, but that won’t change the fact that they do not work, never have worked, and never will work unless they undergo a fundamental change in their treatment philosophy.
If these programs resulted in anything close to actual “success”, there would be independent research to confirm it. But there is none. A few schools and programs have pretended to conduct their own “research”, but it is totally biased and one-sided, done “in house”, and as flawed as the treatment itself. It in no way resembles an objective and independent study, and is in fact selective and anecdotal. The programs and those who refer to them know this, but continue to solicit children and young adults into them, making promises and offering hope they know they cannot deliver. It is not only shameful, but fraud in the fullest sense of the word. Their advertising is deceitful and their business practices, for the most part, are completely unethical.
Sadly, the vast majority of educational consultants – most of whom are IECA members – have no qualifications whatsoever in assessing “special needs” children, i.e., children with psychological or developmental disorders. Many of these educational consultants have no training or qualifications, period. No college degree, no training, no experience. And yet they claim to be experts in advising parents on the placement of their children in programs that are essentially worthless and often charge in excess of $10,000 a month with no guarantee that the child will come out of the program alive, much less improved. Most of these programs are a fraud and a scam, to put it mildly, and their owners, management, and those who support them should be ashamed.
Clarke Poole
North Carolina